On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 09:09:30AM -0600, Alex Elder wrote: > I know we can often just copy [email protected] to get some > patches back-ported, but because there's been a lot of activity > on ceph-related code it's not always straightforward to port > things. > > I have a series of commits--pretty much all of them bug fixes > this time--against 3.7.1, and another against 3.6.11, each of > which is 28 patches long. I also have a series against 3.4.24 > that is 37 patches long. > > I can post them to the mailing list if you like, but before > doing so I thought I'd offer them this way: > > Repository: [email protected]:ceph/ceph-client.git > Branches: > linux-3.7.1-ceph > linux-3.6.11-ceph > linux-3.4.24-ceph > > I skipped 3.5 because I knew it was EOL. I see 3.6 is now > marked EOL; should we stop supplying patches for that release?
Yes, 3.6 is now EOL, so no need to provide patches for them. I've picked up the 3.7 and 3.4 patches from this tree now, many thanks. > Let me know if you'd prefer I post these individually for > review. Thanks. No, this format is fine for me, thanks again for doing this work, it's much appreciated. greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
