On 01/15/2013 12:14 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 09:09:30AM -0600, Alex Elder wrote:
>> I know we can often just copy [email protected] to get some
>> patches back-ported, but because there's been a lot of activity
>> on ceph-related code it's not always straightforward to port
>> things.
>>
>> I have a series of commits--pretty much all of them bug fixes
>> this time--against 3.7.1, and another against 3.6.11, each of
>> which is 28 patches long. I also have a series against 3.4.24
>> that is 37 patches long.
>>
>> I can post them to the mailing list if you like, but before
>> doing so I thought I'd offer them this way:
>>
>> Repository: [email protected]:ceph/ceph-client.git
>> Branches:
>> linux-3.7.1-ceph
>> linux-3.6.11-ceph
>> linux-3.4.24-ceph
>>
>> I skipped 3.5 because I knew it was EOL. I see 3.6 is now
>> marked EOL; should we stop supplying patches for that release?
>
> Yes, 3.6 is now EOL, so no need to provide patches for them.
>
> I've picked up the 3.7 and 3.4 patches from this tree now, many thanks.
>
>> Let me know if you'd prefer I post these individually for
>> review. Thanks.
>
> No, this format is fine for me, thanks again for doing this work, it's
> much appreciated.
Thank you very much for pulling them in. I saw them go by
and all looks fine from my end.
-Alex
> greg k-h
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
