On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 06:51:53AM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 10:18:37AM +0100, Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > will we see a backport for the above fix for the 3.0.X tree?
>
> Is it applicable to the 3.0.x tree? And if so, someone needs to
> backport it, and provide it to me, can you?
For 3.2.y I've cherry-picked (in this order):
848e8f5f0ad3169560c516fff6471be65f76e69f
95cf00fa5d5e2a200a2c044c84bde8389a237e02
910ffdb18a6408e14febbb6e4b6840fd2c928c82
9899d11f654474d2d54ea52ceaa2a1f4db3abd68
9067ac85d533651b98c2ff903182a20cbb361fcb
The last three fix the more recently-discovered race. The first two
are a fix for an x86-specific race in ptrace, made by Oleg back in
August. The fourth at least textually depends on the first two.
I'm not sure whether 3.0.y would need anything more.
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings
We get into the habit of living before acquiring the habit of thinking.
- Albert Camus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
