On Tue, 2013-02-19 at 20:35 +0100, Stefan Priebe wrote:
> Am 19.02.2013 20:05, schrieb Ben Hutchings:
> > On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 06:51:53AM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> >> On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 10:18:37AM +0100, Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG 
> >> wrote:
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> will we see a backport for the above fix for the 3.0.X tree?
> >>
> >> Is it applicable to the 3.0.x tree?  And if so, someone needs to
> >> backport it, and provide it to me, can you?
> >
> > For 3.2.y I've cherry-picked (in this order):
> >
> > 848e8f5f0ad3169560c516fff6471be65f76e69f
> > 95cf00fa5d5e2a200a2c044c84bde8389a237e02
> > 910ffdb18a6408e14febbb6e4b6840fd2c928c82
> > 9899d11f654474d2d54ea52ceaa2a1f4db3abd68
> > 9067ac85d533651b98c2ff903182a20cbb361fcb
> >
> > The last three fix the more recently-discovered race.  The first two
> > are a fix for an x86-specific race in ptrace, made by Oleg back in
> > August.  The fourth at least textually depends on the first two.
> >
> > I'm not sure whether 3.0.y would need anything more.
> at least on 3.0 this picking does not work as
> 910ffdb18a6408e14febbb6e4b6840fd2c928c82
> 
> does not apply. But backports of the last three are here:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg31694.html

Oleg, could you comment on whether 'ptrace/x86: Partly fix
set_task_blockstep()->update_debugctlmsr() logic' should be backported
to 3.0.y as well?

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings
Sturgeon's Law: Ninety percent of everything is crap.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Reply via email to