On 02/20, Shuah Khan wrote:
>
> On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 1:35 PM, Stefan Priebe <[email protected]> wrote:
> > at least 3.2 stable got all 5 backports:
> > 6d0d3f3aca8f6ec0cd91d062abab0196905a9352
> > 667958738244e5be2cb1e05ab1f2a112c52e1c64
> > bb24eda9eee7a1cc865bb10dbb89edf7c1f5cdc7
> > f224540e9fc7be42e1867f1e4967889b29073abb
> > 8957028bd89221048c784d524ee42513356fc822
> >
> > Stefan
> >
>
> Greg/Oleg,
>
> Based on the discussion so far, doesn't look like there is a need to
> send patches to 3.0 and the ones Oleg sent can be applied. Please
> correct me if I am wrong.
Sorry, confused...
I can only confirm that PTRACE_SETREGS fixes doesn't need
848e8f5f0ad3169560c516fff6471be65f76e69f
ptrace/x86: Introduce set_task_blockstep() helper
95cf00fa5d5e2a200a2c044c84bde8389a237e02
ptrace/x86: Partly fix set_task_blockstep()->update_debugctlmsr() logic
although at the same time these patches look simple/safe enough.
Or did you mean something else?
Oleg.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
