[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STANBOL-39?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12984107#action_12984107
]
Fabian Christ commented on STANBOL-39:
--------------------------------------
Just wanted to add that we decided on the mailing list to use the active form
of names . That would be
stanbol.reasoner
stanbol.refactorer
stanbol.ontology and stanbol.reengineer do not fall exactly in this schema. Is
this a problem or should we think about it, e.g.
stanbol.ontology - the ontology and rule manager (the one with scopes, and
sessions)
-> stanbol.ormanager (?)
stanbol.reengineer - reengineering from structured data to RDF
-> Is 'reengineering' meant as reverse engineering? I don't see the 'reverse'
- isn't it just a conversion?
-> stanbol.converter or to be more specific stanbol.converter.rdf (?)
> Rename the KReS java package
> ----------------------------
>
> Key: STANBOL-39
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STANBOL-39
> Project: Stanbol
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: KReS
> Reporter: Olivier Grisel
>
> New name: org.apache.stanbol.reasoning or org.apache.stanbol.reasoner (I
> don't remember what was decided, I cannot find the email, please comment
> below).
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
