On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 12:32 PM, Suat Gonul <[email protected]> wrote:
> I would propose "resourcemanager" name as the component contains mainly CRUD
> functionalities on ontologies resources and previous "dataaccess" is a bit
> unclear. What is your opinion?

If it stores ontologies than why not calling it

ontologystore
ontologymanager

>
> After having a decision on the name, we will do the necessary updates on the
> code and integrate it under the current "ontologymanager" directory.
>

What is the actual directory?

stanbol/ontologymanager/{name}

in that case one could even call it just "store" because

stanbol/ontologymanager/store

also sounds reasonable

best
Rupert



-- 
| Rupert Westenthaler             [email protected]
| Bodenlehenstraße 11                             ++43-699-11108907
| A-5500 Bischofshofen

Reply via email to