Hi, 2011/3/23 Rupert Westenthaler <[email protected]>: > On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 12:32 PM, Suat Gonul <[email protected]> wrote: >> I would propose "resourcemanager" name as the component contains mainly CRUD >> functionalities on ontologies resources and previous "dataaccess" is a bit >> unclear. What is your opinion? > > stanbol/ontologymanager/{name} > > in that case one could even call it just "store" because > > stanbol/ontologymanager/store > > also sounds reasonable
Yes, that was my point. I don't see any confusion here. As a sub package of ontologymanager it is clear that this store is exclusively for the ontologymanager. -- Fabian
