Hi,
Fabian Christ wrote:
Hi,
2011/3/23 Rupert Westenthaler <[email protected]>:
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 12:32 PM, Suat Gonul <[email protected]> wrote:
I would propose "resourcemanager" name as the component contains mainly CRUD
functionalities on ontologies resources and previous "dataaccess" is a bit
unclear. What is your opinion?
stanbol/ontologymanager/{name}
in that case one could even call it just "store" because
stanbol/ontologymanager/store
also sounds reasonable
Yes, that was my point. I don't see any confusion here. As a sub
package of ontologymanager it is clear that this store is exclusively
for the ontologymanager.
Thanks for the comments. Then we will update the name as "store" and
migrate the packages to Stanbol in a few days.
Suat
