XMPP Extensions Editor wrote:
This message constitutes notice of a Last Call for comments on XEP-0166
(Jingle).
Abstract: This document defines a framework for initiating and managing
peer-to-peer multimedia sessions (e.g., voice and video chat) between two
Jabber/XMPP endpoints in a way that is interoperable with existing Internet
standards.
URL: http://www.xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0166.html
This Last Call begins today and shall end at the close of business on
2007-12-14.
Please consider the following questions during this Last Call and send your
feedback to the [email protected] discussion list:
1. Is this specification needed to fill gaps in the XMPP protocol stack or to
clarify an existing protocol?
2. Does the specification solve the problem stated in the introduction and
requirements?
3. Do you plan to implement this specification in your code? If not, why not?
4. Do you have any security concerns related to this specification?
5. Is the specification accurate and clearly written?
Your feedback is appreciated!
Two smaller nitpickings for section 1. ...
"with the negotiation being completed XMPP" - for my
english-as-a-foreign-language ears a word or two seems to be missing
after 'completed'. maybe "over", "using" or "inside"?
"but building in support for these features" - I am very unsure about
'building in'. it sounds strange to me in this context, "built-in"
sounded better.
WDYM?
Bernd
