Joe Hildebrand wrote: > I won't be able to do a careful review of this for a week or more,
I think the Council won't vote on it until December 20 or so (the next meeting has not yet been scheduled but I hope it will happen before the end of the year). In any case you should have time to review it before the Council considers it. I need to read it over again carefully myself. > but > this works for me, assuming I can't talk anyone out of v= being required > and hash= optional or not included in the new world. I think this > version's approach will work, and that backward compatibility will be fine. > > minor nit: should the example node URI really end in "/"? You mean like this...? node='http://code.google.com/p/exodus/' That trailing slash is the default resource. I tend to put it into URLs for completeness, but it's not necessary by any means. Peter > On Dec 6, 2007, at 7:39 PM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote: > >> OK, once more with feeling! >> >> I've tried to incorporate feedback received on XEP-0115 (Entity >> Capabilities). Details follow. >> >> Rendered text: >> >> http://www.xmpp.org/extensions/tmp/xep-0115-1.5.html >> >> SVN diff since 1.5pre9: >> >> http://svn.xmpp.org:18080/browse/XMPP/trunk/extensions/xep-0115.xml?r1=1409&r2=1461 >> >> >> SVN diff since 1.4: >> >> http://svn.xmpp.org:18080/browse/XMPP/trunk/extensions/xep-0115.xml?r1=1145&r2=1461 >> >> >> Are we there yet? >> >> Peter >>
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
