Il giorno gio, 20/12/2007 alle 12.31 +0100, Marco Barisione ha scritto: > I would explain somewhere what port.p2pj is, saying that it means > peer-to-peer Jabber port (or at least I suppose it means that :) and > that it SHOULD be included even if the same value is in the SRV field > for compatibility with some clients.
Sorry, I was not clear. I know that it's explained in http://www.xmpp.org/registrar/linklocal.html, what I mean is that I would add a note where you say "the port may be any unassigned port number" saying that the port SHOULD also be included in port.p2pj for compatibility. -- Marco Barisione http://www.barisione.org/
