Peter Saint-Andre wrote: > Marco Barisione wrote: >> Il giorno gio, 20/12/2007 alle 12.31 +0100, Marco Barisione ha scritto: >>> I would explain somewhere what port.p2pj is, saying that it means >>> peer-to-peer Jabber port (or at least I suppose it means that :) and >>> that it SHOULD be included even if the same value is in the SRV field >>> for compatibility with some clients. >> Sorry, I was not clear. I know that it's explained in >> http://www.xmpp.org/registrar/linklocal.html, what I mean is that I >> would add a note where you say "the port may be any unassigned port >> number" saying that the port SHOULD also be included in port.p2pj for >> compatibility. > > Yes that seems reasonable.
Links for version 1.1pre2 follow. http://www.xmpp.org/extensions/tmp/xep-0174-1.1.html (reload) http://svn.xmpp.org:18080/browse/XMPP/trunk/extensions/xep-0174.xml?%40diffMode=u&%40diffWrap=s&r1=1483&r2=1487&u=3&ignore=&k= Peter -- Peter Saint-Andre https://stpeter.im/
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
