Marco Barisione wrote:
> Il giorno gio, 20/12/2007 alle 12.31 +0100, Marco Barisione ha scritto:
>> I would explain somewhere what port.p2pj is, saying that it means
>> peer-to-peer Jabber port (or at least I suppose it means that :) and
>> that it SHOULD be included even if the same value is in the SRV field
>> for compatibility with some clients.
> 
> Sorry, I was not clear. I know that it's explained in
> http://www.xmpp.org/registrar/linklocal.html, what I mean is that I
> would add a note where you say "the port may be any unassigned port
> number" saying that the port SHOULD also be included in port.p2pj for
> compatibility.

Yes that seems reasonable.

Peter

-- 
Peter Saint-Andre
https://stpeter.im/

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Reply via email to