On Jan 22, 2008 5:26 PM, Richard Dobson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Well, then the XEP should say something about that or even better that > > this protocol should be used instead of XEP-0092 since it's generally > > bad to have two standards with the same or nearly the same purpose. In > > the end the target of a standardization organization is to have just > > one protocol for a certain purpose otherwise there is implementation > > overhead to remain interoperability. > > > Give Peter a chance, he only wrote this less than 24 hours ago... > > Richard > > >
I didn't want to push anyone. Just wanted to make my point clear enough so everybody understands what I mean. Tobias
