On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 9:39 PM, Dave Cridland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've never been all that convinced about binary XML forms. They work > to a degree with the highly fixed XML in, for example, SyncML, and > they're pretty good at compressing individual stanza-like objects > over SMS for things like OMA EMN (Email Message Notification, or > something - I've long since forgotten what these acronyms stand for), > but for long-running streams I'm under the impression that studies > show it'll be outperformed. > > So if you're a big fan of Binary XML formats, please bring along your > figures. :-) Missing the reference, but you should get the best with binary + compression, however it's not worth the candle, since EXTENSIBLE binary xml is not easy (there are fast infosets, but the specification is incredibly complex) and the gain is not so high -- Fabio Forno, Ph.D. Bluendo srl http://www.bluendo.com jabber id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
