Hi,
On Feb 27, 2008, at 2:59 PM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
Pedro Melo wrote:
On Feb 25, 2008, at 2:00 AM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
On day 1 of the DevCon we talked about abuse reporting. Last week I
wrote a small spec about it:
http://www.xmpp.org/extensions/inbox/error-abuse.html
I did a quick read, and I like what I saw so far. I need to read it
again though.
I hope you read version 0.0.2 -- it's much better than 0.0.1. :)
I think it was 0.2, but I'll re-read it anyway... :)
We may want to change that so it's similar to XEP-0161, or even
merge
the two (isn't spim a subset of abuse?):
The first time I saw example 1 above, I though "hmms.. we might
need a
reason here...".
So if we add a <reason> to the <abuse> stanza, we could merge 161
with
this.
Is that a human-readable reason or a machine-readable reason? Or do we
want both, perhaps?
I think a machine-readable version is important because most of the
time these reports will be generated by automated processes.
Human readable might be interesting for one-off reporting by a end-
user. But this spec focus on server-to-server reporting.
Best regards,
--
Pedro Melo
Blog: http://www.simplicidade.org/notes/
XMPP ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Use XMPP!
