Pedro Melo wrote: > Hi, > > On Feb 27, 2008, at 2:59 PM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote: >> Pedro Melo wrote: >>> The first time I saw example 1 above, I though "hmms.. we might need a >>> reason here...". >>> >>> So if we add a <reason> to the <abuse> stanza, we could merge 161 with >>> this. >> >> Is that a human-readable reason or a machine-readable reason? Or do we >> want both, perhaps? > > I think a machine-readable version is important because most of the time > these reports will be generated by automated processes. > > Human readable might be interesting for one-off reporting by a end-user. > But this spec focus on server-to-server reporting.
Agreed. I'll define some machine-readable conditions as child elements, so people could always define other conditions in other namespaces if needed. Peter -- Peter Saint-Andre https://stpeter.im/
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
