Peter Saint-Andre wrote: > Pedro Melo wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On Feb 27, 2008, at 2:59 PM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote: >>> Pedro Melo wrote: >>>> The first time I saw example 1 above, I though "hmms.. we might need a >>>> reason here...". >>>> >>>> So if we add a <reason> to the <abuse> stanza, we could merge 161 with >>>> this. >>> Is that a human-readable reason or a machine-readable reason? Or do we >>> want both, perhaps? >> I think a machine-readable version is important because most of the time >> these reports will be generated by automated processes. >> >> Human readable might be interesting for one-off reporting by a end-user. >> But this spec focus on server-to-server reporting. > > Agreed. I'll define some machine-readable conditions as child elements, > so people could always define other conditions in other namespaces if > needed.
Done in version 0.0.3: http://www.xmpp.org/extensions/inbox/abuse-reporting.html Peter -- Peter Saint-Andre https://stpeter.im/
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
