Tomasz Sterna wrote: > Dnia 2008-03-30, nie o godzinie 13:20 +0300, Alexander Tsvyashchenko > pisze: >> There's one other idea I have, but it may break backward >> compatibility >> and I'm not sure if it doesn't break something else: what if JIDs >> like >> 'domain.com' are treated like 'wildcards' (like it is now), but >> '@domain.com' are considered to be exact matches of domain JID (so, >> basically, JID with empty user name)? >> >> The same for resources: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' is treated like wildcard, >> but '[EMAIL PROTECTED]/' is exact match of bare JID? > > I think it is counter-intuitive. > Logic would hint that domain.com is exact match and @domain.com is a > wild match. > Similar with [EMAIL PROTECTED] is exact match and [EMAIL PROTECTED]/ is wild > match.
Agreed. Peter -- Peter Saint-Andre https://stpeter.im/
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
