On 05/09/2008 7:59 AM, Alexander Tsvyashchenko wrote: > > Hello Peter, > >>> Ok, but "parent" linking for collections still needs to be added to >>> XEP-136 if you agree with the approach we've discussed. >> >> I think it's too early to specify that in XEP-0136, because the "parent" >> stuff is just a suggestion in XEP-0201. But if XEP-0201 moves forward >> then we can add it to XEP-0136. > > Ok, that sounds logical - currently it's more or less "advanced" thing > anyway, "thread" element is not used in some of the major Jabber clients > till now even without "parent" link ...
Right. >> Alexander, does XEP-0136 incorporate all your other feedback? > > Yes, it seems so. The issues left, as far as I remember, are either for > other XEPs or broader than just XEP-136: > > 1) JIDs matching: the conclusion seemd to be to use 'exactMatch' > attribute (?), but as you've pointed out this is the problem not only > for XEP-136. I added that: http://www.xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0136.html#collections-with I still need to add it for privacy lists and MUC if we feel it is valuable there. > 2) 'changed' element in RSM responses: was agreed to be not critically > important right now, and belongs to XEP-59 anyway. Yes perhaps we need to look at XEP-0059 next. :) Peter -- Peter Saint-Andre https://stpeter.im/
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
