On 06/10/2008 3:31 PM, Nathan Fritz wrote: > IIRC, the reason /me was never made into a XEP is because of similar > arguments. It doesn't matter. We don't need to normalize chat behavior. > If they see /me they'll know what it means, and if they see it rendered as > an action, great. The XEP is just a recommendation on how you could > interpret the message body. It's not worth normalizing into some sort of > namespace for actions. We can always do that later if there's a demand for > it.
Is that a vote in favor of documenting this in a historical XEP, or a vote against that documentation? P -- Peter Saint-Andre https://stpeter.im/
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
