On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 2:34 PM, Peter Saint-Andre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 06/10/2008 3:31 PM, Nathan Fritz wrote: > > IIRC, the reason /me was never made into a XEP is because of similar > > arguments. It doesn't matter. We don't need to normalize chat behavior. > > If they see /me they'll know what it means, and if they see it rendered > as > > an action, great. The XEP is just a recommendation on how you could > > interpret the message body. It's not worth normalizing into some sort of > > namespace for actions. We can always do that later if there's a demand > for > > it. > > Is that a vote in favor of documenting this in a historical XEP, or a > vote against that documentation? > +1 Historical XEP
