On 06/16/2008 11:09 AM, Marcus Lundblad wrote: > m�n 2008-06-16 klockan 18:44 +0200 skrev Andreas Monitzer: >> On Jun 16, 2008, at 18:37, Peter Saint-Andre wrote: >> >>> I would not say that XEP-0224 has been implemented widely yet. >> Pidgin and Adium do implement it, but changing the namespace there >> shouldn't be a major problem. >> > Infact, the implementation in libpurple doesn't announce support > correctly presently. I've made a patch that fixes that. It has not yet > been reviewed though. > > On another thought, it would probably be possible for a client to > included a message with the attention, so that a user could define some > predefined "attention messages". One thought was that this could be a > child element of the <attention/> tag. But on the other hand, a client > could format a message containing an <attention/> tag in some special > manner even using the spec. as it is unmodified.
I don't have any preferences about that, though perhaps a <text/> child be better in case we want to internationalize the messages (different message for English vs. German or whatever) -- personally that seems like overkill to me, but you never know what users will get excited about. ;-) > By the way, was XEP-0224 first suggested by the Adium team? IIRC, yes. Peter -- Peter Saint-Andre https://stpeter.im/
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
