On 06/16/2008 11:53 AM, Marcus Lundblad wrote: >> I don't have any preferences about that, though perhaps a <text/> child >> be better in case we want to internationalize the messages (different >> message for English vs. German or whatever) -- personally that seems >> like overkill to me, but you never know what users will get excited >> about. ;-) >> > Yes, that could be one possible use-case. Though that would probably > require some set of pre-defined texts that clients know about.
I don't think that would be required. It's user-specified, you can put
anything there you like. But what gets shown to the receiver if the
message is something like the following?
<message from='[EMAIL PROTECTED]/lab'
to='[EMAIL PROTECTED]/home'
type='headline'>
<body>Why don't you answer, Herbie?</body>
<attention xmlns='urn:xmpp:attention'>
<text>Dude, wake up!</text>
</attention>
</message>
Seems confusing to me.
> Maybe
> that would be a bit out-of-scope for the XEP...
>
> Perhaps it would suffice if the user can add an arbitrary message to the
> attention message (using the normal means).
Why not just use the message body?
> Maybe an alternative could be a "type" attribute <attention/> tag. But
> then the definition of what types there are is left to be defined. Maybe
> that would be a bit too detailed.
I think so.
Peter
--
Peter Saint-Andre
https://stpeter.im/
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
