yes "we" was a bit confusing.
I hope we can move forward quickly and finalize a way forward at the XMPP Summit in July. boyd On 6/20/08 11:57 AM, "Peter Saint-Andre" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 06/20/2008 8:48 AM, Boyd Fletcher wrote: >> there is still contention on whether we tie whiteboarding to SXDE or not. > > Here "we" seems to be the XMPP developer community. > >> We >> vote not to since a whiteboarding is far more than editing an XML document. > > Here "we" seems to be you and your team. > >> We would move to move forward on the issue soon before someone outside of >> XMPP community �solves� the problem for us. ;) > > Here "we" seems to be you and your team. > >> We end up playing catch-up. >> We have a golden opportunity to get firmly ahead of the SIP/SIMPLE folks. > > Here "we" seems to be the XMPP developer community. > > Confusing. :) > > For myself, I've been steadily working through a number of higher > priorities in my personal work stack -- Jingle, the bis drafts, > dependencies for those (e.g., server dialback), etc. So soon I'll > finally work my down the priority list to an in-depth review of the > whiteboarding proposals. Not that we should hold up progress on > something until I review it... > > Peter
