On Sun, 5 Oct 2008 02:48:55 +0200 Jonathan Schleifer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Matthew Wild" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > If they type it manually then they know what they are doing, and > > when they come to type the stanza for resource binding, they will > > read the RFC and see that it recommends not specifying a resource :) > > Which is IMO a painfully bad idea for users with instable connections. > They will have thousands of resources online after a short while and > you don't know which to msg. Very, very bad idea, IMO. Makes it > totally unusable with an unstable conenction. You *WANT* a static > resource then, so you can replace the old, dead connection. > Very good point! Btw, is there a real reason to use randomized resource strings... or is it just to overcome bugs made by client and server developers? Pavel -- Pavel Šimerda Freelancer v oblasti počítačových sítí, komunikace a bezpečnosti Web: http://www.pavlix.net/ Jabber & Mail: pavlix(at)pavlix.net OpenID: pavlix.net
