Dave Cridland wrote: > The following thought for the day arises from a conversation I had with > Kevin Smith; so whilst all opinions and mistakes are my own, this is > heavily influenced by Kevin. > > The behaviour for different <message/> types is different, by design. > > In particular, when sent to a non-existent resource: > > headline - broadcast. > error - discard. > normal/chat - highest priority, offline, or error. > > Now, groupchat messages are currently handled as normal/chat. But should > they be?
Define "currently"; I made a fix to this text in the last revision of rfc3921bis: http://xmpp.org/internet-drafts/draft-saintandre-rfc3921bis-07.html#rules-barejid-noresource-message /psa
