Dave Cridland wrote: > On Mon Oct 27 17:36:49 2008, Peter Saint-Andre wrote: >> Peter Saint-Andre wrote: >> > Dave Cridland wrote: >> >> On Mon Oct 27 17:24:20 2008, Peter Saint-Andre wrote: >> >>> Dave Cridland wrote: >> >>>> Now, groupchat messages are currently handled as normal/chat. But >> >>> should >> >>>> they be? >> >>> Define "currently"; I made a fix to this text in the last revision of >> >>> rfc3921bis: >> >> Ah, cool, however, this really affects 8.3.1.1, or 8.2.2. >> > >> > Author oversight. Will fix. >> >> Never mind, because 8.2.2 says: >> >> For a message stanza, the server SHOULD treat the stanza as if it were >> addressed to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> as described in the next section (but >> without >> modifying the value of the 'to' attribute). > > Yes - either 8.2.2 would need fixing, or else "the next section" it > points to when other resources are available, which is 8.3.1.1, would > need fixing, because it says: > > For a message stanza of type "chat", "error", "groupchat", or > "normal", the > server SHOULD deliver the stanza to the highest-priority available > resource. > > 8.3.2.1, the section you've changed already, only affects the case where > no resources for the account are available.
Aha, correct. Too many subsections...
