On Mon Oct 27 17:36:49 2008, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
> Dave Cridland wrote:
>> On Mon Oct 27 17:24:20 2008, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
>>> Dave Cridland wrote:
>>>> Now, groupchat messages are currently handled as normal/chat.
But
>>> should
>>>> they be?
>>> Define "currently"; I made a fix to this text in the last
revision of
>>> rfc3921bis:
>> Ah, cool, however, this really affects 8.3.1.1, or 8.2.2.
>
> Author oversight. Will fix.
Never mind, because 8.2.2 says:
For a message stanza, the server SHOULD treat the stanza as if it
were
addressed to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> as described in the next section (but
without
modifying the value of the 'to' attribute).
Yes - either 8.2.2 would need fixing, or else "the next section" it
points to when other resources are available, which is 8.3.1.1, would
need fixing, because it says:
For a message stanza of type "chat", "error", "groupchat", or
"normal", the
server SHOULD deliver the stanza to the highest-priority available
resource.
8.3.2.1, the section you've changed already, only affects the case
where no resources for the account are available.
Dave.
--
Dave Cridland - mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] - xmpp:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- acap://acap.dave.cridland.net/byowner/user/dwd/bookmarks/
- http://dave.cridland.net/
Infotrope Polymer - ACAP, IMAP, ESMTP, and Lemonade
