-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 5/14/09 10:29 AM, Curtis King wrote: > > On 13-May-09, at 4:40 PM, Florian Zeitz wrote: > >> I'm also not really sure why anyone might ever want to use hashes. > > +1
The Google Talk guys I talked with said they would do hashes. I'd like to see broader adoption, so I see no reason to discourage the hash approach. Besides, this is all out in implementation land -- the only thing that the spec needs to say is "the identifier is opaque to the client". Peter - -- Peter Saint-Andre https://stpeter.im/ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkoMR5UACgkQNL8k5A2w/vwTFQCgmRskk4ww7w2IcRmbIYTC3xnu B60An3C9a5EaXwI6+xioZWIjXaJGWA6G =Gjq4 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
