On 14-May-09, at 12:05 PM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
The only way that interop would break here is ifclients are treating versions as something other than opaque, which theyare not supposed to do. Please explain.
You just did, opaque means there is room for misinterpretation (This thread offers some proof ;-)). I was just trying to get people to consider that cost against the flexibility an opaque value offers.
moving on... ck
