On Mon, 2009-06-22 at 13:30 +0100, Pedro Melo wrote: > On Jun 22, 2009, at 12:28 PM, Bernhard zwischenbrugger wrote: > [..] > > romeo > > > > // username > > Node identifier. > > In some contexts username might be appropriate. > > [..] > > > <iq from="pubsub.example.com" node="something"> // jid+node > > Not sure what you mean here. This is not even a valid stanza. There is > no "node" in the top level <iq />
What Bernard means in the latter case is that publish-subscribe requests and service discovery requests are targeted at a node, using the (possibly empty) 'node' attribute. The value of this attribute is referred to as NodeID, or Node Identifier. I find it highly confusing to have optional part of a JID before the '@' also be called Node. As I don't feel like changing any protocol over this, could we possibly change the name of this JID part in 3920bis? -- Groetjes, ralphm
