On Mon, 2009-06-22 at 09:48 -0600, Peter Saint-Andre wrote: > On 6/22/09 6:30 AM, Pedro Melo wrote: > > > On Jun 22, 2009, at 12:28 PM, Bernhard zwischenbrugger wrote: > > > >> [email protected] // > >> room jid? > > > > In the context of a MUC service, yes. > > There is no term for this in XEP-0045. > > >> [email protected]/niki // room > >> jid? > > > > No, in the context of the MUC spec, this is a participant JID. > > In XEP-0045 this is a Room JID. > > Maybe it would be better to call these "Room JID" and "Occupant JID"?
Yes please, I think I mentioned recently that I find the current definition of 'Room JID' to mean the address of the occupant in a specific room highly confusing. Also, there is currently no name for the JID of the room itself. For the code I'm working on, I'm going to assume the new wording will be exactly those you suggested here. -- Groetjes, ralphm
