-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 6/22/09 10:21 AM, Ralph Meijer wrote: > On Mon, 2009-06-22 at 13:30 +0100, Pedro Melo wrote: >> On Jun 22, 2009, at 12:28 PM, Bernhard zwischenbrugger wrote: >> [..] >>> romeo >>> >>> // username >> Node identifier. >> >> In some contexts username might be appropriate. >> >> [..] >> >>> <iq from="pubsub.example.com" node="something"> // jid+node >> Not sure what you mean here. This is not even a valid stanza. There is >> no "node" in the top level <iq /> > > What Bernard means in the latter case is that publish-subscribe requests > and service discovery requests are targeted at a node, using the > (possibly empty) 'node' attribute. The value of this attribute is > referred to as NodeID, or Node Identifier. > > I find it highly confusing to have optional part of a JID before the '@' > also be called Node. As I don't feel like changing any protocol over > this, could we possibly change the name of this JID part in 3920bis?
In http://xmpp.org/extensions/inbox/nodes.html we suggested changing this to "local identifier". Another option is "localpart". Peter - -- Peter Saint-Andre https://stpeter.im/ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAko/sG8ACgkQNL8k5A2w/vzmJACgijXV5stiBQlY3Axsj5MK3aBn unoAoIl/EGCWwH44I7vQtafE+AviiRhX =y7bo -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
