-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 9/10/09 4:18 AM, Dave Cridland wrote: > On Thu Sep 10 11:14:56 2009, Fabio Forno wrote: >> On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 11:10 PM, Peter Saint-Andre >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> > Similarly, I suggest that we remove it from the JID >> > matching rules in XEP-0016, XEP-0045, etc. >> > >> > Objections? >> >> No, since all the cases where we may need the concept of subdomain >> could be solved at application level with other extensions (e.g. I'm >> thinking of a case we worked on time ago where we had to consider a >> subdomain trusted and autoaccept all subscribe from that subdomain) >> >> > I would argue that there is no such thing as a subdomain, from the > perspective of XMPP.
I'm getting close to saying that (I'm not quite sure what you mean by "subdomain" so I don't know what I'm committing to by agreeing with you). In any case I think we need to remove this from JID matching rules, because the status quo is confusing. Peter - -- Peter Saint-Andre https://stpeter.im/ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAkqpB44ACgkQNL8k5A2w/vzYzQCfQ6nHuDRBgAEWyA/4ntEee9Ms 5fIAoOFH/fbP326ADvB1PET17DtVZ8J6 =5lul -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
