On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 3:05 PM, Peter Saint-Andre <[email protected]> wrote: > I'm getting close to saying that (I'm not quite sure what you mean by > "subdomain" so I don't know what I'm committing to by agreeing with > you). In any case I think we need to remove this from JID matching > rules, because the status quo is confusing.
I think the status quo is probably that people don't do this anyway ;) I don't see why subdomains get any special treatment, anyway. /K
