On 3/30/10 4:00 AM, Ralph Meijer wrote: > On Mon, 2010-03-29 at 22:57 -0700, Joe Hildebrand wrote: >> On 3/29/10 3:50 PM, "Peter Saint-Andre" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> 1. A clearer description of the use cases that truly need IQ-based >>> notifications. >>> >>> 2. An applicability statement that strongly discourages IQ-based >>> notifications unless absolutely necessary. >> >> 3. A description of what you're going to do when you don't receive the >> response. >> > > Three fine points, indeed. > > I'm also wondering if we should move it to a separate specification > altogether.
And ask those who care about it to write that spec. :) In the meantime, I would say let's pull it out of v1.13 of XEP-0060 so we can get that finished. I have a few small things to fix with regard to redirects [1] but other than that I think it's ready to go. /psa [1] http://xmpp.org:5290/muc_log/muc.xmpp.org/council/100329/#13:39:34
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
