On May 10, 2011, at 5:39, "" <[email protected]> wrote: > Why not a subscription type of count, to go along with items and nodes? > Effectively there's also a hidden one of subscriptions, too, in a sense.
I'm not a fan of this. Wouldn't you need two new sub types: "items-count" and "nodes-count"? Actually, there's no way, short of walking the node graph to get even an initial count of nodes, so maybe I'm just over-thinking this. -bjc
