On Tuesday, May 10, 2011 11:57:19 AM Sergey Dobrov wrote: > On 05/11/2011 01:46 AM, Justin Karneges wrote: > > On Tuesday, May 10, 2011 11:14:04 AM Sergey Dobrov wrote: > >> I think that it is enough to retrieve it by request with > >> node's metadata. > > > > The problem there is that you cannot track updates to the count without > > polling. > > Every event adds to the count one, am I wrong? :)
Ah, so perform the query after an event happens? I guess that would work. I still think the SHIM header would be useful too, as an optional optimization. If not present in an event, then the client could query for the value afterwards. Justin
