On Wednesday, May 11, 2011 03:06:22 AM Sergey Dobrov wrote: > On 05/11/2011 03:16 AM, Justin Karneges wrote: > > This /almost/ works. Updated items that are not yet known to the client > > would incorrectly cause an increment. > > I already asked in JDEV why we don't include timestamps with events. > Timestamps can solve this problem.
Or better yet just a flag for created vs updated, which should be even more robust.
