On Aug 24, 2011, at 20:43, Evgeniy Khramtsov wrote: > 25.08.2011 08:52, Matthew A. Miller wrote: >> >> I think in this case, we'll survive (-: > > I don't like PEP, so I won't :P
What specifically about PEP do you not like? Or you can discover how to stop worrying and love the PEP (-: > >> Having the ability to know when a vCard changes without having to poll is >> very very very nice. > > We already have vcard-temp:x:update for that. > In my opinion, "vcard-temp:x:update" is a hack: * It is documented in XEP-0153 solely for vCard(-temp)-based avatars * It violates at least one SHOULD in RFC 6121 ยง 4.2.2 (presence update not related to a user's availability for communication or the communication capabilities of the resource) * It requires at least one resource for a user to be or become online (inappropriate to impossible for corporate/enterprise deployments) Also, what happens when XEP-0292 supersedes XEP-0054? - m&m <http://goo.gl/voEzk>
