On 8/24/11 9:59 PM, Matthew A. Miller wrote: > > On Aug 24, 2011, at 20:43, Evgeniy Khramtsov wrote: > >> 25.08.2011 08:52, Matthew A. Miller wrote: >>> >>> I think in this case, we'll survive (-: >> >> I don't like PEP, so I won't :P > > What specifically about PEP do you not like? Or you can discover how to stop > worrying and love the PEP (-: > >> >>> Having the ability to know when a vCard changes without having to poll is >>> very very very nice. >> >> We already have vcard-temp:x:update for that. >> > > In my opinion, "vcard-temp:x:update" is a hack: > * It is documented in XEP-0153 solely for vCard(-temp)-based avatars > * It violates at least one SHOULD in RFC 6121 ยง 4.2.2 (presence update not > related to a user's availability for communication or the communication > capabilities of the resource) > * It requires at least one resource for a user to be or become online > (inappropriate to impossible for corporate/enterprise deployments) > > Also, what happens when XEP-0292 supersedes XEP-0054?
urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:vcard-4.0:x:update, anyone?
