On 8/24/11 9:59 PM, Matthew A. Miller wrote:
> 
> On Aug 24, 2011, at 20:43, Evgeniy Khramtsov wrote:
> 
>> 25.08.2011 08:52, Matthew A. Miller wrote:
>>>
>>> I think in this case, we'll survive (-:
>>
>> I don't like PEP, so I won't :P
> 
> What specifically about PEP do you not like?  Or you can discover how to stop 
> worrying and love the PEP (-:
> 
>>
>>> Having the ability to know when a vCard changes without having to poll is 
>>> very very very nice.
>>
>> We already have vcard-temp:x:update for that.
>>
> 
> In my opinion, "vcard-temp:x:update" is a hack:
> * It is documented in XEP-0153 solely for vCard(-temp)-based avatars
> * It violates at least one SHOULD in RFC 6121 ยง 4.2.2 (presence update not 
> related to a user's availability for communication or the communication 
> capabilities of the resource)
> * It requires at least one resource for a user to be or become online 
> (inappropriate to impossible for corporate/enterprise deployments)
> 
> Also, what happens when XEP-0292 supersedes XEP-0054?

urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:vcard-4.0:x:update, anyone?



Reply via email to