On 03/14/2012 07:04 AM, Joe Hildebrand wrote: > On 3/13/12 2:55 AM, "Sergey Dobrov" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Actually, it's >> not clear how pubsub service will receive the presence in case of pubsub >> (and not presence) subscription. > > PEP.
So the title of the XEP can mislead. The other thing that the same problem exists for the regular pubsub so it will be necessary to invent the other XEP which solve the same problem other way... > >> And again the XEP will have problems with from/to subscription states.. > > No. PEP. It only really works with subscription='both'. > I *really* can't understand which applications are suitable to solve with such PEP restriction except of moods/tunes/etc (but pubsub since is completely unnecessary for such applications). The real applications for which the XEP can be useful (i.e. microblogging) are needed to be fully compliant with the regular presences. So I think that the problem should be solved in future but such XEPs only make the solution even harder. I will be pretty happy to know if I wrong but I did not even hear about any applications PEP is needed in the current state. -- With best regards, Sergey Dobrov, XMPP Developer and JRuDevels.org founder.
