It may be that I'm reading a restriction into the spec that wasn't intended by 
the authors.  If so, then maybe a simple clarification is needed (like drop the 
"Last" from the title).


On Aug 13, 2012, at 9:15 AM, Kurt Zeilenga <[email protected]> wrote:

> Why is this restriction restricted to editing the "last" stanza sent?
> 
> Is this due to presentation issues?
> 
> If so, I think the clients are going to have to deal with them no matter what 
> restrictions we place on senders...  because a sender cannot control other 
> senders.  In short, receiving clients have to appropriately deal with 
> replacements for non-last stanzas.  And as clients are certainly going to 
> have to deal with this MUC, seems no big deal for them to deal with it 
> general.
> 
> Anyways, if there's no particularly strong reason to have the "last" message 
> restriction, I think it should be removed.
> 
> -- Kurt
> 
> 
> On Jul 31, 2012, at 1:52 PM, XMPP Extensions Editor <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>> This message constitutes notice of a Last Call for comments on XEP-0308 
>> (Last Message Correction).
>> 
>> Abstract: This specification defines a method for marking a message as a 
>> correction of the last sent message.
>> 
>> URL: http://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0308.html
>> 
>> This Last Call begins today and shall end at the close of business on 
>> 2012-08-17.
>> 
>> Please consider the following questions during this Last Call and send your 
>> feedback to the [email protected] discussion list:
>> 
>> 1. Is this specification needed to fill gaps in the XMPP protocol stack or 
>> to clarify an existing protocol?
>> 2. Does the specification solve the problem stated in the introduction and 
>> requirements?
>> 3. Do you plan to implement this specification in your code? If not, why not?
>> 4. Do you have any security concerns related to this specification?
>> 5. Is the specification accurate and clearly written?
>> 
>> Your feedback is appreciated!
> 

Reply via email to