On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 4:23 PM, Philipp Hancke <[email protected]> wrote: > Am 13.08.2012 22:05, schrieb Mark Rejhon: >> >> In addition, it would likely be non-backwards compatible in a >> "graceful degrade manner", e.g. MUC > > [...] >> >> The way both me and Kevin has currently specified, ensures that both >> 0301 and 0308 will work and interop fine in mixed-MUC situations. > > Frankly, I would recommend MUCs to filter out any RTT stuff. Unless they > want to take part in amplification attacks of course. But that's not for the > 0308 LC, is a problem that 0045 has in general and only shows when dealing > with heavy traffic.
Not an option. Some demos of Next Generation 911 uses MUC combined with XEP-0301 Better option: Server control of enabling/disabling 0301 on a per-chat-room basis Mark Rejhon
