> On Dec 22, 2014, at 6:47 AM, Holger Weiß <[email protected]> wrote: > > * Kurt Zeilenga <[email protected]> [2014-12-22 05:31]: >> I think if anything in XEP 191 needs to change, it's the discussion of >> how one maps XEP 191 onto XEP 4 privacy lists that should change. It >> should be clearly stated that the blocking entity is required to perform >> the mapping in such a way that all communications with the blocked JID >> are blocked. > > And how should that entity map privacy rules that just block _some_ of > the communication back to XEP-0191 rules?
You don’t. At best, if you are using a common backend in, you only can show JIDs in 191 are in a privacy list whose semantics are the same as those of 191. — Kurt > > Holger
