* Dave Cridland <[email protected]> [2014-12-22 16:31]: > On 22 December 2014 at 14:47, Holger Weiß <[email protected]> wrote: > > * Kurt Zeilenga <[email protected]> [2014-12-22 05:31]: > > > I think if anything in XEP 191 needs to change, it's the discussion of > > > how one maps XEP 191 onto XEP 4 privacy lists that should change. It > > > should be clearly stated that the blocking entity is required to perform > > > the mapping in such a way that all communications with the blocked JID > > > are blocked. > > > > And how should that entity map privacy rules that just block _some_ of > > the communication back to XEP-0191 rules? > > XEP-0191 maps to XEP-0016, not the other way around.
XEP-0191 says it should work in both directions: | If one of a user's clients uses privacy lists instead of blocklists and | modifies the default privacy list by removing a blocked JID or blocking | a new JID, then that change will be reflected in the blocklist. | | [...] | | If one of a user's clients removes the default privacy list and | substitutes a new list for the old list, the blocked JIDs in the new | default privacy list (if any) will become the new blocklist. [ http://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0191.html#privacy ] Holger
