On 22 December 2014 at 14:47, Holger Weiß <hol...@zedat.fu-berlin.de> wrote: > > * Kurt Zeilenga <kurt.zeile...@isode.com> [2014-12-22 05:31]: > > I think if anything in XEP 191 needs to change, it's the discussion of > > how one maps XEP 191 onto XEP 4 privacy lists that should change. It > > should be clearly stated that the blocking entity is required to perform > > the mapping in such a way that all communications with the blocked JID > > are blocked. > > And how should that entity map privacy rules that just block _some_ of > the communication back to XEP-0191 rules? > >
XEP-0191 maps to XEP-0016, not the other way around. I think internally, I'd mark the privacy lists that are really XEP-0191. Dave.
