Heh I was about to write the same thing. Pub/Sub would probably be the answer here - except that the doc is somewhat long (not light)..
/Steffen > On 14 Jan 2015, at 10:16, Steven Lloyd Watkin <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Sounds more like pub sub to me :) > > On 14 Jan 2015 08:27, "Piotr Nosek" <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I would like to discuss a functionality that we have implemented in the past > for mobile applications. It could become a new standard perhaps, because > there is quite high demand for it. > What I have in mind is a kind of presence-less MUC. People using e.g. > WhatsApp will know what I'm talking about. > The highlights of such solution are: > * No presence information - when you're in the group, you're visible for > everyone > * No hiding behind nicks > * Very simple role set: just owner and members > Internally we call this extension "MUC light" and if nobody disagrees, I > guess it's the name of the topic I propose. :) > > Regards, > Piotr > > ----- Oryginalna wiadomość ----- > Od: "Kevin Smith" <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> > Do: "XMPP Standards" <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> > Wysłane: wtorek, 13 styczeń 2015 14:04:10 > Temat: [Standards] Discussion topics for the summit > > Hi folks, > Council had a think about possible topics for the summit, and came up with > these. If you have thoughts about other things to discuss, please share them > (and hopefully we’ll capture them in the wiki before the summit). > > Social network interop (Buddlycloud/Movim/SåT), device-consistent chat (MAM, > Carbons, read markers, etc.), Distributed MUC, IoT. > > /K
